Apparently, I am supposed to be clutching my pearls in horror at the whole Sarah Jessica Parker dress controversy -- namely, that this gown had been worn before not once but TWICE, which has caused SJP to say things about how she is so disappointed in the designer for this terrible oversight and has the media claiming it's trashing her "fashion icon" status. Come on, really? I get that Sex and the City hinges on being able to brag about all the free, so-fresh-off-the-catwalk-it-hasn't-even-been-on-it-yet clothes it uses, so this was an important premiere, but let's get some perspective here. Would it REALLY have been better if she'd worn never-before-seen
electric blue-and-chartreuse leggings, simply because they'd yet to
skim another human's inner thigh? Has it really RUINED EVERYTHING? Do we all NEED to be running off and slamming our bedroom doors so that everyone knows we are having a wicked-serious tantrum? Just ONCE I wish someone would be like, "You know what? I don't care. The dress is awesome, and I looked hot. Big freaking deal."
Having said that, let's have a squizz at Marchesa's Georgina Chapman:

And now let's bring in Lake Bell, from back in April:
Having said that, let's have a squizz at Marchesa's Georgina Chapman:
And now let's bring in Lake Bell, from back in April:
Continue reading Who Fugged It Better (Or Worse).




