« Independent Spirit Awards Fug Carpet: Maria Bello | Main | Oscar Post-Party Fugshion: Mischa Barton »

March 1, 2005

Oscar Post-Party Fugshion: Stephanie Seymour

There are times in a fugger's life when she is rendered speechless. When everything she tries to write can't do justice to what inanities, spurred by crazy pills and possibly absinthe, are marching through the head of a celebrity.

This is one of those times.


[Photos courtesy of Daily Celeb.]

I can only assume that, when she got wind that Usher was attending the Oscars, Stephanie Seymour's post-show orgy radar went, "Ping!" And so she watched a few episodes of Dynasty, crafted a curiously frump-ho Linda Evans tribute negligee -- in this case, "negligent lingerie" -- and marched that pendulous rack right up to him to see if he needed a sixteenth for the sex train.

And, to let him check out the caboose:

There is something deeply entertaining about the fact that she brought a wrap, but didn't actually wrap it around anything but her fist.

172 Comments

That is ghastly, just ghastly.

Boy has she gotten zaftig! A teddy covered with multiple black scarves. Hey! Maybe she's the entertainment? Dance of the Seven Veils? She's totally chewing gum too... okay, she is married to that old geezer so that would explain the Dyansty era choice of gown.

She forgot to take off what she was modelling at her victoria secret shoot earlier that day...or maybe she was just in a big hurry to make it to the oscar parties.

I don't understand what you people are shocked about... this is the woman who did afterall have sex with Axl Rose--yellowish gray teeth and all.

That's so bad it's totally awesome. It seriously breaks every rule and crosses every line and is so indecent and scary that it's truly amazingly awesome.

I'm scared.

WHY?????? *Shakes uncontrollably* Just. Freaking. Blah. This is so, so very sad. This makes Bai Ling's beach bag look like Kate Winslett's charming gown. Sad. Just. Urgh. I've got the speechless bug from that travesty.

I think Frederick's of Hollywood is calling.

that is so god awful that i want to die... eww scared

actually, I think she looks great-like a real woman with actual breasts and hips and a pretty good ass. Well, maybe not so real-maybe more like Salome after regifting King Herod with John the Baptist's head on a platter and receiving a lovely parting gift of a beautiful women's department negligee from the Jacquelyn Smith "Euphrates"collection at Kmart along with ten gold drachmas stuck in her leather thong.

Working hard for that starring role in SHOWGIRLS 2.

The dress is kind of terrible, but it highlights her awesome body, so I don't actually hate it. I'd wear that, too, if I had such a smoking hot body.

Okay, that's not true, but still: she looks nice.

Zaftig? I'd like to see what your body looks like at that age. She's in great shape, just no fashion sense to go along with it.

She looks pretty good for a woman in her 40s . . . but still . . . check out the bra strap across the back . . .

Is this an Oscar party or a Motel 6?

Note to Stephanie Seymour...It's Vanity Fair the Magazine that sponsors the party, not Vanity Fair the bra manufacturer.

How many rubber chickens were skinned in the making of that useless wrap? She must have Spencer's Gifts on speed dial.

Welp, there's no denyin' she's got a hot bod.

BlackIrish, yer killin' me! *snortgiggle* :-D

I'm sorry, but I love it. It's so bat-shit crazy, it's brilliant.

I like the look on her face, too- it's screams: Yeah, it's cold as hell underneath this reconstructed piece of tissue paper, but you're talking about me, and not Tyra, for the first time since Axel and I parted ways.

She looks exactly the same as she did 10 years ago! If I looked as good as her I would gladly wear that nighty, just not in public.

Smokin' body? Sure.

Ho-bag fashion sensibility? Definitely.

I'm guessing this is one of those gowns that looks perfectly acceptable under normal lights and does the "see through" effect only under the bright lights of the cameras. So I'll give Stephanie a pass and say that her only faux pas was not checking the dress under bright lights before she wore it to an Oscar party.

She is actually only 36, but she has had three children. Bad (or no) fashion sense, obviously, but she does have a great body!

She is actually only 36, but she has had three children. Bad (or no) fashion sense, obviously, but she does have a great body!

I am so amazed that someone would leave the house like this that words escape me (almost). While I agree that she is pretty awesome physically -- that is not the point. There is no way that this is appropriate attire for anything other than a bordello. This bitch is obviously nuts. Somebody call CPS to protect her children.

Yummy body, trampy fashion sense. I'm torn on this one...

Unprecedented!

(btw if the Ladies of GoFugYourself need to go on spring break, BlackIrish has my vote for Special Guest Fugger.)

Does it bother you guys that you're going to hell? Actually dreamt about your website and awoke feeling truly sorry for you. Oh, nevermind.

awesome body? i must be missing something here. i thought that was kirstey alley.

UH-UH! No she didn't! That is just appalling.

Perhaps she misread 'Post Oscars Party' as 'Pajama Party' on the invite... an easy mistake to make, what with all those "p's" in there. I suppose now that she's close to 40, her eye-sight isn't what it used to be.

Oooh, I'm going to have to cast my vote with the "couldn't possibly have known it would be this transparent under flash" contingent and pray to god it's true.

I'll never forget the placid look on Alexandra Kerry's face as she walked through Cannes in her black dress, not knowing she was TOTALLY NUDE on film. gah!

The dress is one thing, but wtf is up with the wrap? wrong, wrong I tell you.

She is apparently an avid vintage couture collector, which makes this choice especially puzzling.

I'm sorry, but there's no way that dress is anything but transparent under any lighting conditions.

That said, if she's got the balls to wear it, more power to her. It's nice to see a curvy woman flaunting her curves. And her face and hair look spectacular.

The only way this outfit could have been better is if she had put pasties on her nipples, a la Ali Landry. Nonetheless, well done, Stephanie!

Hey, Ninaberries, Kirstie Alley is still hot, bigger, yeah, but she is still one very good looking woman.

My mind just blanked.

Gotta admit, it's a real eyecatcher.

Compared to that container of dental floss Cher wore that one time, this is nothing. And I'm sorry, but I'm way more offended that the whole back of her bra is visible than I am by her butt cheeks.

Alexandra--
We are judgemental. You are judgemental. We judge the fug. You judge us.

Help me out here. What is the difference there, exactly, that condemns us to "hell" while you smugly expect to go without punishment?

The only difference I can see is that we are less hypocritical.

Hey Emily,

To respond to your inquiry about what my body looks like? I'm actually 38 years old, have a 16 year old daughter and still have the ass and abs of an 18 year old. These Nitwits put themselves out there in the public eye. I consider any celebrity to be fair game for whatever commentary comes their way. We are expected to buy, listen to, watch, and admire every little bit of "genuis" these people come up with. Most people would look "that good" if they could afford, Lipo, Botox, Collagen, Silicone, Personal Trainers, Nutritionists, Facialists, Stylists(in her case, scratch that), Hairdressers to the Stars, and a very discreet Drug Dealer. Who do you have to sleep with in this town to get a deal like that? Sign me up.

See, you can wear something like this to a college party or Rocky Horror, but you can't wear it to anything that has anything to do with a red carpet. See, red carpet is supposed to equal class. Notice I say "supposed to" because it seems to have lost that connotation. *sigh* And MollyMonkey is completely right. First thing I thought of when I saw that wrap was, "Oh, the poor rubber chickens!"

last time I checked, there was no making fun of fashion clause in the hell mandate.

That is so wrong and insane that words can hardly do it justice. it's just crazy!
i second that vote for blackirish, that's some funny shit.
oh, and ninaberries.....yeah, this is an awesome body. She looks so, so, so much better than the Kate Bosworth/Calista Flockhart crew who can barely hold up their lollipop heads on top of their toothpick bodies. The woman is not 18 anymore, and she looks rockin' hot in my book. (i stand by the "insane outfit" comment, however)

you have got to admire her balls! how much more "in your face" can you get?

And there were those who thought the "November Rain" video would be her lowest point.

Congratulations, Dramatika. You're my new hero.

"She looks exactly the same as she did 10 years ago! If I looked as good as her I would gladly wear that nighty, just not in public."

Damned right you are, pinky! And her butt is a mirror image of mine, and when I'm her age I'd LOVE to be rocking it at a glam party with plenty of security to protect my happy ho ass -- but oh yes, tacky as shit it is indeedy :)~

Yeah, I think she looks hot.

Well, I was going to say I thought her bod looked amazing but needs to lay off the vicodin whilst dressing, but I wouldn't want to go to hell. Damn.

Oh, please, lots of woman older than this look better, yet have the good sense not to run around swathed in Hallowe'en curtains. There's nothing more pathetic than a car pool Mom not knowing when to cover up.

But she's not a car pool mom. She's a model and a minor celebrity. And she's not on her way to a soccer match. She's at an Oscar party. Different rules apply.

Wow ninaberries, you must be very pro-ana...Stephanie looks as much like Kirstie Alley as Halle Berry looks like Missy Elliot.

akadrenaline-- Well, if she's got them, this is certainly is a dress that gives us the opportunity to admire them!

All I have to say is that I was so pleased when I saw her "large" butt (large ONLY in comparison with the stick-bodies we typically see on celebrities). Obviously it takes a huge amount of will-power to stay wafer-thin, and when celebrities lack outside motivation to stay thin (like an upcoming album, photo shoot, TV show or movie), they revert back to a normal American weight.

PS: I ALSO have a perfect ass and abs and boobs and big toes, as well as no visible cellulite. I am SO proud of myself!

I'm really torn here. I think she has a fabulous body (no matter how she got it - I don't go asking why your ass is flabby or tight) and agree that her hair and makeup look amazing. However, I can't imagine that she had no clue that thing was as transparent as it is. The wrap thing is the worst part of this whole getup.

Oh, yeah Emily - I am going to hell with gasoline drawers on. See you there! I'll be the one critiquing your outfit which I am sure will make just about as much sense as you do.

Blackirish - you are the shzznit.

Oh, yeah Alexandra - I am going to hell with gasoline drawers on. See you there! I'll be the one critiquing your outfit which I am sure will make just about as much sense as you do.

Blackirish - you are the shzznit.

Regarding whatever it is she's holding: OH MY GOD! She hath slain a Phoenix.

WERD to blackirish on the salome/euphrates collection riff - snarky and cultured, what more could we ask for? So we're all in love with blackirish today.

And hurray!!! We're all going to hell! So sorry you won't be there Alexandra, but hopefully we'll manage to live without you. Or, like Samantha once said, Honey, everyone has a hobby. Some people do arts & crafts, we judge.

Back to your arts & crafts now Alexandra, run along.

Baby got BACK!

Hollywood stylists really do need to have a centrally located klieg light gown-checker setup.

My God that is AWESOME! Can you imagine how much she had to drink before leaving the house with the courage to wear a see-through nighty as a dress? I Love IT! Let me have that courage someday...
And seriously, isn't she in her 40s and there isn't one dimple on that ass? Life isn't fair.

~AK

get this girl some fuzzy ostrich slippers and set up the Vargas style photoshoot! She looks absolutely lusciously qualified for it. Until then, put on a robe, gf, and have some sense of decorum.

That dress and wrap looks like it was inspired by a 1983 Camaro with "fire" detailing. Crud, when did she get so chesty?

Did anyone read that book Model-she's a total slut. I just didn't realize she dressed like one in public.

well at least she wore underpants. imagine if bai ling had chosen this "outfit."

sometimes I think to myself: "self, wouldn't it be nice to have the confidence to do whatever I wanted? Wear what ever I wanted?"
And then myself sees pictures like this and i'm all: "haha, she looks stupid."
That gives me faith to keep on not doing what I want to do, like wear see-thru outfits.

She must have been at that slumber party that Tim Robbins had the night before, the one where Dustin Hoffman got so wasted that he couldn't present the Best Picture award, Lou Gossett got so drunk that he slept through the entire ceremony, and Al Pacino and Tim just rolled out of bed and blindly put on each other's tuxedos... maybe Stephanie did some sort of striptease for them that carried over to the next day, as they all seem to have been in too much of a hurry to put much thought into how they looked before they stepped out onto the red carpet...

...only Stephanie didn't bother to take the time to change out of her burlesque gear...

isn't she the one who is married to a plastic surgeon?

Does anyone know where I can score a new pair of retinas? Just let me know. That'd be great.

She is a beautiful woman, but why is she wearing a nightdress to the Oscars? Also, it's either too short or too long (I suspect it's too short, as Seymour is quite tall).

And wearing a regular bra with a backless, um, "gown"? That's TEH LAME. Either go commando or wear those little stickie-on-thingies. It's not like Stephanie Seymour doesn't have access to lingerie aplenty.

Let's ask this question again, why is she wearing a nightdress to the Oscars? I mean, a NIGHTDRESS. To the OSCARS.

I like her shoes. They cover more than this "dress" does.

for the record, i prefer a jlo ass to a calista flockheart anything. i like women with real breasts and real butts. however, prehaps it's the "natural lighting" or the angle of this snapshot, but her tits look saggy, her arms look like sausages, and her ass looks, well, it looks... not so good. and also, the line of the panties is too low on her legs. and it appears she has some kind of um fatty fanny. i mean that in the british way.

Steph is one of the phee-ew who could pull it off!

Sorry Nina, but she has plenty of oomph in her Oompahs and woomph in her Loompah! (*thx-who-ever used oompah-loompah originally).

If one of the cadaverous, junkie thin waifers like Natalie Portman, Meg Ryan or Allie McSqueal tried to 'model' this it would be like viewing an exo-skeleton from Grays Anatomy.
...A coatrack for Fredericks.

What's with all these people on here bragging about their own perfect abs and butts, etc.? Prove it! I suspect the cluelessly fug celebs aren't the only severely deluded people up in this piece!

I'm sorry T-Man but the world's most perfect Loompah and Oompahs would be done wrong in Stephanie's garment. Granted, I admire her self-confidence but there are just so many horrible mistakes going on there. I mean, did she SEE her camel toe? Notice that her bra had no support? She must have at least _felt_ the wedgie. I can feel her wedgie.

While we're all mentioning our respective body parts, for the record I have a no-ass, boy hips, and breasts that recently realized that they are now over-30. But, I'm still fabulous!

Damn, I left my cover-up at the pool last week. Well, I guess I know who grabbed it.

You know what they say: if you got it, flaunt it. Stephanie Seymour is among the very few women on earth that could go to an oscar party naked and get away with it. Why? Well, maybe because she's a perfect 10.

I'm especially fond of her cheek implants.

79 comments I had to read before someone enlightened me about the camel-toe?
Nestle, I too would like to 'feel her wedgie or camel toe!'

Well I'm not knocking her figure, because she has an awesome body for any age, but OHMYGOD, the dress. (Of course my silly husband was like, "I think the dress is nice. What's wrong with it?" DUUUHHHH......men. As long as there's an ass showing, it's a nice dress.)

Wow. Yes, the dress is ugly, but the woman looks HOT. Glad to see she's off heroin.

Well! SHE'S come a long way since GnR!

Are we sure that's how to spell her last name? It isn't Stephanie See-More?

I for one think she looks fabulous. I love it. I love that she had the balls to wear it, and smile. I love her body- she has one. and its perfect.

Perhaps that she thinks her last name is a command for how she should dress...(Stephanie, let them see more:)

Skip the wrap and this dress would make the perfect outfit for running around a haunted castle in the middle of the night. Maybe she had unusual post-Oscar plans.

Are you sure she's off heroin? Can't tell by the way she dresses.

Oh, and she's married to a gazillionaire publisher - Peter Bart (sic).

Stephanie, honey, you look fabulous. But either put some real clothes on or go back to bed with your Rubber Chicken Serape. That's not an Oscar Party outfit you have on.

She forgot to check the dress for flash transperancy. She's now the Ass of the Ball *hehehe*

If this is fug, then fug me baby, fug me all night long.

I am still in shock that you haven't done a fug on the Star Jones sausage skin dress from the oscars!

Where's "Hef" when you need him....

think there's room in his bed for one more?

Man, that marriage to Axel Rose really screwed up her mind. Maybe she's still on drugs to wear this outfit out in public. It's just wrong.

Wow! WHAT BAZOOMS!
Camel toe = crotch cleavage, for whoever asked.

I'm amazed that people are still talking as though this dress is transparent all of the time. Some dresses actually do only do the see-through thing in the bright lights of the flash (like with the Alexandra Kerry thing someone pointed out earlier). It is completely obvious that it is an effect of the flash making her look that way. Granted, the bra in the back is tacky, but other than that I see nothing wrong with what she did aside from not checking the dress under the flash beforehand (which is recommended when you're going to wear a dress to an event).

Think you can handle this badonkadonkdonk?

Um, GROUNDED - for at least a month young lady! Bad model! Bad! Bad! But oh my God am I laughing right now. Fug girls - you slay me with the crazy pills and absinthe...

Clearly an audition for the re-makes of 'Faster, Pussycat Kill! Kill! or 'Beneath the Valley of the Ultra-Vixens'.

Russ Meyer I hope you have a pillowy soft 'Mondo' bed in heaven!

If --- If we are assuming the dress is only see-through in flash --- then why, oh why, is her bra connecty thing showing through the "neckline" of the dress. My book says that's slighty worse than bra strap in back.

Has anyone noticed she's wearing two pairs of panties? That's got to be uncomfortable.

You people are too much! Fat? Look at that tiny little waist. Personally, I think it's a bit too much exposure, but it has had the exact desired effect... Exposure! We're all a-twitter! She's been off the charts for some time, and I think she's loving any press she can get. You can see it on her face, "Oh yeah... Take my picture, boys! I'll give 'em something to talk about!" The streets of Hollywood are littered with former supermodels who used to sleep with guys who used to be famous. Not much can return them to the spotlight, but she found a way.

I WISH my body ever looked like that. She is pretty much perfect, in my book. That she has the confidence and brio to wear what she did can only be called ballsy.

I give no creedence to the notion that she didn't know it'd be see-through.

You people are too much! Fat? Look at that tiny little waist. Personally, I think it's a bit too much exposure, but it has had the exact desired effect... Exposure! We're all a-twitter! She's been off the charts for some time, and I think she's loving any press she can get. You can see it on her face, "Oh yeah... Take my picture, boys! I'll give 'em something to talk about!" The streets of Hollywood are littered with former supermodels who used to sleep with guys who used to be famous. Not much can return them to the spotlight, but she found a way.

I WISH my body ever looked like that. She is pretty much perfect, in my book. That she has the confidence and brio to wear what she did can only be called ballsy.

I give no creedence to the notion that she didn't know it'd be see-through.

Anyone who calls this woman fat is a blazing, blooming fool.
However, the outfit is indeed fugly and sublimely distasteful.

The people calling her fat are fucked up. She has a perfect body. I wish she hadn't just proven that to us by wearing that (tacky), but she did.
I really admire the people posting about their own perfect bodies. I wish I had that much... self-esteem (whether combined with delusion or not). It must be a nice life.

Her husband's name is Peter Brandt and he was the the publisher of Interview Magazine. He's also a renowned polo player and the owner of champion horses, etc. She is still drop dead gorgeous from head to toe. But I agree with GFY's assessment of the outfit...definitely hobag Linda Evans/Krystle Carrington lingerie circa 1984

No, sorry, no, nope, no way, no how could it be remotely thought that this so-called dress could possibly be opaque under ANY light. Unless one was blind drunk getting into it.

So so bad.

There is simply no excuse for this sort of thing.

Tsk tsk. Miss Stephanie. You do not need to flaunt this "See? SEE?!! I still look good! Look at me! Please?" getup.

That dress would be really nice if she JUST WORE A SLIP! Didn't her mom ever teach her right? I have a dress very similar, but I WEAR IT WITH A SLIP! Slips, people, slips! The indispensible lingerie of the Southern Lady!

Apparently she assaulted a goth wedding on her way over, stole the wedding veil and wrapped the groom's cummerbund around her to keep it together. She's a lovely lady but there's no excuse for ruining two people's day like that.

Maybe it's the mid-age crisis, you know. Maybe she needs to reassure herself that she's still hot. Her revealing dress kind of crosses the line with a hoochie mamma style but we have to admit that baby got back. As for the cleavage, as Joan Rivers said about Salma's boobs, Steph "looks like she could breast-feed China".

Her figure is awesome. The dress sucks. I mean, really, even if it WASN'T see-though without a flash (and I DO mean FLASH), it committed the Fug sin of being unflattering. She should, indeed, show off that curvy, well-propotioned, sexy, not starved body! This "dress" (if it weren't black I'd wonder if she just wrapped herself in Grandma's "sheers" at the window....) does NOT show off her bod. Sure, it's see-through. But the cut is frumpy. She needs a well-cut, opaque dress to flaunt the boobies and bumbum, and she got it all mixed up.....

LA FACE WIT' AN OAKTOWN BOOTY!

LA FACE WIT' AN OAKTOWN BOOTY!

SING IT WIT' ME, Y'ALL!!!

just how uncomfortable must those high-riding pants be? talk about arse garotte. but she's probably on commission from Victoria's Secrets.

i salute her voluptuous figure but the dress is sheer to the point of invisible. i can only assume the wrap was stolen from cirque de soleil.

http://luckycrackers.blogspot.com/

People, please! Sarcasm – CATCH IT!

We like the girls with the PUMPS AND A BUMP!

you people think the black dress is revealing but in britain we have a 'celebrity' called jodie marsh who goes out dressed like this:
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2004/06/jodiemarshPA040604_250x450.jpg

http://luckycrackers.blogspot.com/

Regarding Jodie Marsh (http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2004/06/jodiemarshPA040604_250x450.jpg) even Lil Kim doesn't look like that. She's gone beyond hoochie mama to cootchie mama.

As for Stephanie Seymour, that outfit is tacky and trashy but she is having a grand time. She has definitely achieved the sort of notoriety publically stroking Axl Rose's balls didn't get her.

All of y'all that think she looks fat? Haters all.

This is what I really wanted to say, but the song just wouldn't come to me last night:
"She's a brick
(mmm mmm mm)
HOUSE!!!
She's mighty mahty, just lettin' it AWL hang out!"

Okay, I saw photos of this elsewhere, and Hoochie Mama Seymour meant for it to all be hanging out. She was pulling that sheer stuff (and it was sheer without the flash, people)up and around, until she was bare up to the thigh. The woman's got problems.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/050228/ids_photos_en/r280516021.jpg

Both sides are right here.

Stephanie Seymour is proof that there is a God, because the haphazard process of evolution could never have produced a body that looks this good, at 36 or any other age. You can send her around to my royal court any day. She can even get away with wearing gauze: She's got the bod for it - and let's face it - women are SUPPOSED to wear high-class hookerwear to Oscar-related events. It's about celebrating the World, the Flesh (especially), and the Devil, not consecrating a bishop.

That said ... it's STILL fugly. "I'm so gorgeous I can almost get away with it" != flattering. Her tits look like they're sticking straight out to each side - I had to step up brightness/contrast to see that they actually aren't. It's pretty bad when you have to do that when the outfit is transparent to begin with. And no ass is at its best when caught in mid-wedgie.

In a flattering outfit - whatever its optical depth - she would have burned out my monitor. Fug is relative, and this is fu

What I don't understand, given the nature of the fugfit, is why no one has made the obvious joke about stephanie SEYMOUR. Or is that too lowbrow for gofugyourself?

The dress looks like she made it out of a Spotlight discount fabric, Whore-Of-Babylon-chiffon or something, but she still looks amazing. And I loved the shoes.

No question about it, this is a beautiful woman and she has a great figure (she's curvy, that's a good thing in today's waif world if you ask me). More power to her for not starving herself but maintaining a great, sexy body and not looking droopy. 36 is still young people, don't act like at 36 everyone should be lucky their boobs aren't around their cankles.

Anyway, the outfit, as rightly pointed out by the fugirls...is Fucking Ridiculous(tm). You do not wear your lingerie out to an Oscar party. I wouldn't be surprised if one of the younger stars at the party mistook her for part of the paid entertainment, or Anna Nicole with dark hair after wandering out of bed in a drug induced sleep walk...

This outfit is 100% fugyourself material. But indeed, leave the fat cracks at home. No pun intended.

Isn't indecent exposure illegal? Can't you get arrested for this? If I wore that I would be arrested, jailed, fined, and raped. But nooooo, this Stephanie Seymour prances around in her mondo boobs and ass that looks like she stuffed jelly in there.

How unclassy celebrities have become.

I missed something- isn't one of her boobs like, bigger and slantier???

man. she looks *way* better than when she was lord of castle greyskull. glad she came to her senses and, like, ate something already.

there's definitely a bit of wonky droopage on the right. but then again that material makes up for in volume what it lacks in opacity.

http://luckycrackers.blogspot.com/

I THINK HER ASS LOOKS NICE. NOTHING WRONG HERE. JUST A NICE CURVY HEALTHY ASS. I'D LOVE TO GRAB IT AND GIVE IT A GOOD SQUEEZE. SKINNY BITCHES SUCK.

AdamP, I think 36 is indeed young - but having cohabited with Axl Rose is supposed to age a woman at least 15 years. So we expected her to look 51. You know, like Courtney Love does.

OK...The outfit's a wrong fashion turn down a bad stretch of road, but look on the bright side...It can't be meant to stay on for too long.

For most men's point of view, complaining about clothes like that on a body like hers is a little like saying you eat sushi rolls for the seaweed.

My thoughts: Her body is way hot. The dress defies comment.
P.S. I'm glad that when I get to hell for all the years of snark and bad behavior I'll be in good company!
P.P.S. I love, love, love this site.

This is not "one of those dresses that only turn transparent under bright lights." This is a NIGHTDRESS.

My mom has a nightgown that looks just like that.

My mother however, has the human decency to put a *robe* over the thing if she has to go outside.

Maybe she can borrow that furry housecoat thing from Maria Bello.

Well...

At least she didn't go commando. Then we'd REALLY get a cooch shot.

OK, I am going to PRETEND for a moment that, under normal lighting, this dress is completely opaque and it is the fault of the flash bulbs that we can see the Victoria's Secret label on her underwear.

STILL, you can see her bra strap across her back, which just makes it look like she chose the wrong bra, and the front doesn't do anything for her breasts, which look like they are flopping to the outside.

AND, if I am going to go with what I truly believe, that this is a piece of see-through lingerie, and Stephanie See-more is just trying to live up to her name, then I will say that it is a completely inappropriate outfit for a woman of any age and of any body shape to wear to a party... even a pajama party.

Does ANYONE in Hollywood know how to accesorize properly?

The bra stap is bad, as others point out.

However, the fitted part at the waist actually fits her! Normally when celebs try this it makes them look poofy and bulgy in an all-wrong way.

But, what's with those damn stringy tassel things hanging down under her right arm? Are those the thingys for keeping the clothes on the hanger and she forgot to tuck them in/cut them off. Or is is a sign she ripped the top layer of the dress off to create an airy effect?

Oh, and Alexandra? Does it bother you that you're completely insane?

What a shame....
She has such a pretty face

Hey Slinky Cat, that Seymour name pun appears numerous times in the comments way previous to yours. Just sayin'.

She is a very attractive woman, with a voluptuous body, but, as with some of the other ghastly clothing disasters being flaunted at award ceremonies, it's a shame that a lack of talent (or fading celebrity status) in their respective categories has to be "covered up", by "uncovering".

There *MUST* have been a lining under there, she just ripped it out.

It's that darn bra strap that really boggles the mind. She used to model lingerie! I mean, has she not heard of the backless bra?

I am a straight girl, but I'd switch teams for a grab of that booty. Oh to have a bod like that.

She does kind of look like she's trolling for high school boys though.

Aaww, I think she looks pretty, provided her destination was an all girls slumber party..But the other girls would be jealous and would totally put Stephs' hand in a bowl of warm water when she fell asleep. Or draw a Hitler mustache on her..or something

She's not fat, per se. I'm just saying that if I had an ass like that, and granted, she's had like four kids, I would cover it up properly. Nobody should be subjected to that backside except her husband.
In other news, it looks like she went to the trouble of placing double-sided tape to the portion "covering" her breasts. It just sits too well...

Hate to throw a curve ball here, but she just had her fourth kid - like within the past month.

She just had her 4th kid??

Even more amazing is the fact the kid will now spend the rest of his life trying to figure out who his father is.
The easy part will be showing his horny pals his hot milfy Mama!

I think her body is great and she's got a nice ass. I don't know why everyone goes off on women's bodies constantly. You're either too fat or it's "eat a sandwich." Who is acceptable? That said...the dress. I'm positive that it was a black dress that looked opaque till hit with the lights. I was actually at the Vanity Fair party and had the same issue with my dress. It looked completely opaque but if you took even a picture with a single point-and-shoot, it would get transparent. I wore a slip on the bottom but the top was too complicated to find anything to go under it. Of course, I'm not a celebrity so I was pretty sure I wasn't going to get my picture taken and would not have to worry about it. I question how she wouldn't realize it; I tend to assume she did realize it and did it for the attention.

Part of the problem (ok, a very teeny one, and if you fixed it it really wouldn't help that much) is that her bra is just too small! If you look at the back shot, it's obvious that it's hiking up in back - the straps dip down sharply where they go around the sides of her body. And as others have noted, her breasts are trying to crawl out the armpits of that top. I think it's about two cup-sizes too small, which means she's not really getting any support at all from it, it's just functioning as nipple-coverage and minor bounce-control. A properly-fitted bra might not look any better under that top, esthetically, but it would do wonders for her shape.

Stephanie, honey? You have a gorgeous body. Congratulations. But - we *didn't* want to see all of it.

Ow. Is the concept of alluring mystique dead?

Oh... wait... I just looked through some of the other pictures on this site. I think I just answered my own question. (Sigh.)

As Axl's song goes, "I used to love her, but I had to kill her."

Pigs in Space, Cows in Lace.

Her bod is supafly. Only someone sick would compare her weight to the 280+ of Kirstie Alley. Please get help. And yes that dress is atrocious UNLESS it was a see-through mishap. If that is the case it is simply fugly.

There is no way this nightgown ever looked opaque to anyone. Just no way. It's not a dress, people! It's a nightgown!!!!!

And anyone who thinks Seymour is "too fat" is crazy. Just flat-out batshit crazy. She looks lovely and curvy and fit.

Did anyone else notice that you can totally see her underwear?

Thanks for pointing that out, Handsome_B, I would have missed it otherwise.

No problem. How embarassing for her!

she has a great body but has anyone else noticed that her butt cheeks are uneven?
oh and alexandra, what is wrong with you?

well we can definently Seymour!

I think Steffie just wanted to out-scandalize all of those rumors about what Axl Rose made her do with a litter box. So now when I think of Stephanie Seymour I will now think, Catbox incident first, followed by the fact that she married some old ass and tries to act as if she was never a groupie whore, then I will think about her sad, attention starved choice in red carpet wear.

THAT IS A WRAP???? I thought she skinned a muppet!!!

In my opinion, Stephanie Seymour is the most beautiful woman in the world and even though her choice of dress is 'different' she still manages to achieve her usual look - amazingly stunning. I don't believe that anyone else could ever manage to get away with wearing that. She still manages to look effortlessly stunning!!

Urm... actually, I think I just sort of fell in love with her. I think it might have been the tacky bra-strap and the evolution of that, ulp... body ... I'm not sure I can explain any of this; emotions, kinda... overwhelming... confused... need to lie down. I'm sorry.

Is her husband walking behind her saying "Look what a billion can buy you!!!"

What's the litterbox incident?

Stephanie has a great figure, especially after just giving birth to her fourth child. I wish i had a body like that! Ok so my ass is that size but it doesn't look good (if u know what i mean) and I'm only 21! Good on ya girl! At least she doesn't look like Mischa "People don't understand how hard it is to be pretty" Barton (that girl should get some actual physical problems before she complains about her hard life.) Ok Mischa Barton rant over! Well done Steph for showing us that women should have curves ( just leave the nighty at home next time sweetie)

About Stephanie's age. This actually depends on which source you believe. According to a 1989 issue of Cosmo magazine she was 25 then which would make her 41. On the other hand according to playboy 1993 pictorial of stephanie she was 24 which would make her 36. If I had to guesss, I think stephanie was lying to playboy rather than cosmo.

About stephanie herself. While she may not be her drop dead gorgeous self the way she was between 1988-1994 I still think she is one of sexiest most beautiful women of all time. If you have any doubt look at her playboy pictorialials, sports illustrated pics, victoria secret pics or just about any pic of her in the late 1980's to mid 1990's.

when i first saw the second pic, I thought that her dress was on fire cuz her wrap was fire coloured and it freaked me out! wat a big fat ass she has!

this site is just full of fat women harping on about how theyre so glad to see a 'REAL' woman etc etc. what makes mischa barton less of a 'real' woman? at least that girls got style. give me a slim girl in trendy jeans and a top over a slightly overweight 40yr old in a see thru nighty any day! wake up ppl!

Search

Fug Favorites


Featured Fugger

Bai Ling

The Book of fug

A book, huh? Is it just stuff you already put on the Web site?

Nope, we wrote the whole thing fresh, just for you.

Awesome. In that case, I want to read it!

Thank you! Click here to find out all the details!

Subscribe to GFY

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner