One nice thing about wiping 2008 off my mental dry-erase board, and training myself to write the date correctly on all my checks, is that I figure there's got to be a new trend coming down the pike that will leave me pleasantly infuriated and maybe even a little nauseated by the force of my own confusion. You know, like what jumpsuits and high-waisted jeans did for me in 2007 and 2008.
So, of COURSE, my first photo-scavenging expedition of 2009 resulted in the regurgitation of that old insidious criminal: leggings. And on one of the usual suspects.
[Photo: FlynetOnline.com]
You know what else hasn't changed in the new year? LEGGINGS STILL AREN'T PANTS. Take a memo, Lohan. Jot it down right under "beg Tina Fey to write another movie role for you" and "prune hair extensions."
But Lindsay wasn't the only offender:
So, of COURSE, my first photo-scavenging expedition of 2009 resulted in the regurgitation of that old insidious criminal: leggings. And on one of the usual suspects.
[Photo: FlynetOnline.com]
You know what else hasn't changed in the new year? LEGGINGS STILL AREN'T PANTS. Take a memo, Lohan. Jot it down right under "beg Tina Fey to write another movie role for you" and "prune hair extensions."
But Lindsay wasn't the only offender:
[Photo: FlynetOnline.com]
TyTy, I thought you weren't modeling for Victoria's Secret any more. So why give your bra so much free advertising?
More to the point, though, are those even full-on leggings? They're cuffed at the bottom almost like they have sweatpants in their DNA. Great. Just perfect. The last thing we need is more mutant strains of leggings masquerading as viable trousers. If you'll excuse me, I'm going to go hug all my pants and let them know I will never forsake them.
