Fug The Cover

UK Tatler May 2009.jpg

Tatler is one of those magazines that I don't buy regularly -- especially since it's so pricy here in the US -- but I consider a glossy treat for long airplane rides. (Also in this category: Teen Vogue and British Glamour, AKA anything purse-sized and/or foreign, preferably both). I'm going on a trip in the near future and I seriously think I will pick this up for the ride -- it's promising me MURDER, royal shenanigans AND, presumably, the story behind why Elle's dress is trying to make a run for it. I've got to uncover the truth on all three fronts.
LILONYLON.jpg
[Photo: Nylon Magazine]

(a) Congrats to Nylon for making it 10 years; especially considering the current state of print media, that is an accomplishment.

(b) Congrats to whomever scrubbed the spray tan off Lilo. I hope you got a bonus.

(c) I had boxer shorts in the same print as whatever those bottoms are IN 1999, and I felt like Kelly Taylor when I wore them around. Kudos for verisimilitude!

(d) IS Lindsay Lohan REALLY a "pin-up for a new era"? I feel like, "a hot mess for a new era" might be more accurate. Or, "a Meredith Baxter Birney for a new era."

(e) Those are...some extensions.

(f) If cropped sweaters are coming back, I quit.
 
This may be the best thing that's ever greeted me in the morning:

SWINTON_Anothermag.jpg

Yes, SWINTON. YES. Tyra Banks would drown in her own joyous slobber if one of the ANTM girls managed an angular, lean, high-fashion pose like that (instead, next cycle, she's picking only a bunch of short girls, presumably so she can then lament that none of them know how to look tall and then cut them for not growing). SWINTON is a skyscraper of a woman, but whatever optical illusion they're using -- a step-stool under the skirt? -- makes her look like a veritable beanstalk. Indeed, I wish this could be the Fug Madness statuette. If we kept an on-site metal-worker at GFY HQ, that person would be hard at work today as Intern George danced around clapping like a little girl at a Dora The Explorer festival.

Having said that, of course, it's definitely also a tiny bit freaky. Especially the way it looks like she's the love child of Max Headroom and one of the ashen, ethereal, bloodless Cullens (as described in the hideous Twilight book, as opposed to as depicted in the possibly even MORE hideous Twilight movie). But on the other hand, it's exactly the kind of cover styling one should use for SWINTON -- imagine how discordant it would feel if, say, she showed up on the cover of Redbook in a Talbot's floral smock and pastel lipstick. We'd all look up to make sure the sky wasn't falling, then run to confession just in case.

khglamapril.jpg

I have to say, in Glamour's defense, the inside of this issue is actually quite good. It's full of useful stuff and pretty pictures, unlike Vogue, which is full of pretty pictures and long articles about secret hair salons on the Upper East Side that require you to present three letters of recommendation and exchange an egg just for a trim. Don't get me wrong: I deeply enjoy reading those articles. They're just not very applicable to real life. As for the cover, it may be a bit TOO MUCH like real life for me, in that I can't get over the fact that Joey Potter's hair looks really dirty.  Let's be honest: so is mine, right now. But I work from home. If I were going to be on the cover of a magazine (God forbid), I am pretty sure I'd wash it.


MK_march_Fashion.jpg

Oops, Fashion magazine -- because if Mary-Kate really "can't stand looking like everybody else," then she's probably going to hate this cover, in which she looks like: a) a fairly generic, if still pretty, tousled blonde with dark eye makeup wearing a boring white sweater; b) the Joker before he's applied his makeup for his daily fear-mongering rampage; and c) an actress who's had so much collagen shot into the skin under her nose that one might assume a duck bill had been implanted in there surgically. Now, I realize the quote probably means she hates DRESSING like everyone else -- which means she must be irate that the likes of Shenae Grimes and flame-haired fame-whoring doofus Phoebe Price have taken to wearing shredded, homeless-looking leggings, since M-K gets credit for first plucking that style from Zoolander and turning it into a fug phenomenon -- but it's also still kind of a weird choice for the cover from a girl who has a near-clone as a twin. You know Ashley's going to run across this cover and think, "Wait, is THAT why she never gets up to watch Full House with me during the early-morning reruns? I always thought she just hated my popcorn," and then we might be barreling toward a massive miscommunication and subsequent twin estrangement that not even the soothing touch of John Stamos can mend, and then where will we be? LOOK WHAT YOU'VE MAYBE DONE, FASHION MAGAZINE. I HOPE YOU'RE HAPPY WITH YOURSELF.
gwynnie.jpg

We just got an email about this cover from a reader, who noted that she's totally going to wear this into work tomorrow. Which is funny, because I wore my quasi-doublet and my shortie pantaloons YESTERDAY.  The thing is, I get that this is "THE FASHION ISSUE" and ergo the cover must be devoted, not to fashion or even Fashion, but to FASHION, which leads to....you know, boxer shorts-esque shortie short bloomers and a half-fantastic/half-inspired-by Mickey-Mouse-ears jacket that is one of those things where you're like, "yes, I grasp the fabulousness while also recognizing that it's kind of ridiculous and literally no one, NO ONE could wear this for real ever and therefore it sort of has no point and is like the clothing version of a tree not making sound if it falls in the woods and there's no one to hear it," but my question is, if you're going to be putting someone in your Tree Falling In the Woods outfit, wouldn't you rather have, like, Linda Evangelista? At the very least, she could pose without losing her neck.
February 2, 2009

Fug the Cover: Kate Hudson

katehud.jpg

This little gem comes courtesy of our friends at Girl With a Satchel, and may I be so bold as to wonder what the people over at Aussie Cosmo are smoking, and why it prompts them to use so very many different fonts? Also, obviously, I would like to know what happened to poor Kate's face here. That doesn't seem to be the chin I imagine her wearing (in all the time I spend thinking about Kate Hudson's face, which is not as much as this post would suggest, in that I hardly think about it at all), and I think we can ALL imagine what Miss Tyra would say about her neck, or lack thereof. None of this, of course, is Kate's fault: I suspect that someone over at the magazine got so distracted by the headline "Sex GPS: Take the scenic ride to Mount Pant-orama" that they didn't notice what, exactly, they had done to her in that one fated moment of Photoshoppery and by the time they recovering from the eye-rolling, it was too late. Mount Pant-orama is where I buy jeans, by the way. The deals are exceptional, but the altitude will kill you.
January 23, 2009

Fug The Cover: Camilla Belle

camillabelle_nylonmag.jpg

What is going ON here? Not only is Camilla Belle wrapped in a hellacious hodge-podge of pieces -- a cropped coat with alien tentacles attempting to steal second base, a blue shirt with what looks like a piece trailing down the front of some high-waisted formal bloomers, and leggings that look like half-migraine, half-villain in a video game -- but she looks super cranky about it. Which does not give me much faith that I will fall in love with any of the 243 looks Nylon insists will tickle my heart. Especially not if I'm supposed to wear this many of them at the same time. If I were in Franz Ferdinand, and I saw this cover, I might react to being named Nylon's best-dressed band in the world by immediately burning my entire wardrobe and moving to an alpaca farm in darkest Peru.
January 22, 2009

Fug the Cover: Jenna Fischer

jennafself.jpg

Can we discuss why someone at Self hates Jenna Fischer? Seriously. She's CUTE. And yet here they appear to have photoshopped her face to the point where it looks like each of her eyes is from a totally different picture -- and, indeed, perhaps a totally DIFFERENT PERSON. Is it possible that Self's photo editor is a John Krasinski mega-fan, who has convinced herself that she and John can finally wed on the astral plane or whatever once she breaks up Jim and Pam, and that the only way to do that is to make poor Jenna Fischer's face look like it's oh so slowly melting? Because that seems like a bad idea. It's certainly not doing any of us any favors.
January 16, 2009

Fug the Cover: Isla Fisher

islaallure.png

This is an AMAZING cover....for 1987. Which reminds me, I am totally late for social studies! I knew taking those last ten minutes to write a letter to the cast of 21 Jump Street wasn't a good use of my time. WHEN am I going to have time to read about how to order a steak? I'LL NEVER FIGURE THAT OUT ON MY OWN.

Search

Fug Favorites


Featured Fugger

Bai Ling

The Book of fug

A book, huh? Is it just stuff you already put on the Web site?

Nope, we wrote the whole thing fresh, just for you.

Awesome. In that case, I want to read it!

Thank you! Click here to find out all the details!

Subscribe to GFY

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner